3/16/2023 0 Comments Chronicle pro review![]() The survey does not account for the quality or comprehensiveness of the training other respondents received. The struggle to find peer reviewers varies widely depending on the journal and field, but some scholars say the system’s flaws can be traced in part to an essential issue with peer review: No one’s sure who is supposed to teach it.Īccording to a report on the 2018 Global Reviewer Survey, 39.4 percent of respondents have never received any peer-review training. One scholar told The Chronicle it took four years and submitting to three different journals to get a manuscript published because of problems finding reviewers. In dire cases, the research may become outdated before it’s published. When reviews do come in, some editors have noted seeing more short and unhelpful critiques, leading to longer review periods and harder decisions for editors. That means researchers wait for months while their papers languish on an editor’s desk. Those who accept requests to peer review for a journal are becoming increasingly unlikely to complete their critiques. The pandemic was also a shock to the system, causing more researchers to push the task to the side as other responsibilities piled up. Highly respected academics can receive several peer-review requests a day, and may not have time to perform more than a few a month. But peer review is often unpaid and unacknowledged work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |